Capability comparison
A fair, capability-by-capability look. Each provider has genuine strengths — QuickNode and Alchemy lead on raw RPC performance and EVM tooling; Tatum leads on sheer chain count. CryptoAPIs leads on unified breadth and native compliance.
| Capability |
CryptoAPIs |
QuickNode |
Alchemy |
Tatum |
Moralis |
| Primary model |
Unified REST API (data + wallets + market data + AML) |
RPC nodes + marketplace add-ons |
RPC nodes + enhanced APIs |
Unified multi-chain API |
Onchain data platform (data + wallet + NFT/token APIs) |
| Native AML / address screening |
Yes — first-party, 20+ chains |
Add-on (Scorechain, MistTrack) |
Partner (Forta, MistTrack) |
Yes — 5 chains (BTC/ETH/LTC/SOL/TRON) |
No native AML |
| Transaction screening (KYT) |
Yes — address + transaction |
Via add-on |
Via partner |
Address only |
No |
| Watch-only xPub / HD-wallet tracking |
Yes — EVM, UTXO & XRP |
Yes (Blockbook add-on) |
Limited |
Yes |
Yes — xPub derive & monitor |
| Unified cross-chain REST |
Yes — same shape across chains |
Partial |
Partial, EVM-centric |
Yes |
Yes — data API |
| Chains supported |
20+ |
20+ |
~15 (EVM-heavy) |
130+ |
30+ (EVM, Solana, Bitcoin) |
| Market data (prices / rates) |
Yes — CoinMarketCap-sourced |
No |
Limited |
Limited |
Yes — token prices |
| Node / RPC access |
Yes — NaaS + Dedicated |
Yes (core) |
Yes (core) |
Yes |
No |
| Webhooks / events |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes — Streams |
| Free tier |
Yes, no card |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Comparison compiled July 2026 from each provider's public documentation and marketplace. Competitors' AML capabilities are delivered largely via third-party add-ons or partners (QuickNode: Scorechain / MistTrack; Alchemy: Forta / MistTrack); Moralis is a Web3 data platform (30+ chains, strong xPub tracking) without native sanctions/KYT screening. CryptoAPIs and Tatum offer first-party AML — Tatum across 5 chains (address-only), CryptoAPIs across 20+ (address and transaction). Capabilities change; verify current details on each provider's site.